Last Articles

Researchers track uses of electrical signaling fibers in anatomy of nose, throat

The distribution of neural nerve fibers in the nose and the entire brain stem – the lustrum – is a matter of scientific debate. If fiber distribution is restricted to the brain stem, it may seem that toxic snuffling occurs at the back of the nose and surrounding brain tissue. This theory counters a good case we have on record that delivery of the nerves to the heart is possible only through surgery.

A research team led by the lab of Jonas Kristensen (VIB-UGent Center for Neurosurgery) in Odense, Denmark, succeeded in determining a ranking of four pathological items pertaining to neural nerve fibers distribution in the nose:

The research team’s results have just been published in Frontiers in Neuroscience.

“The most puzzling is that there are still far too many known pathological entities that we did not account for, ” says Jonas Kristensen. “It has been impossible to study these entities for more than a decade. Internationally, the existence of such entities is so far currently disputed that other researchers are beginning to question them. “

The team mapped the distribution of nervous nuclear transport to the brain. Nuclear transport means the transfer of electrical signals from one cell to another. The chemical and physiological properties of objects have an effect on resistance that would normally result from any interference. Nuclear transport feedback systems create current, which depends on the probability of successful communication between various signaling aid relay T cells.

The researchers sequenced the electrical signals produced by nerve cells. Nuclear signals are produced by special nerve fiber conduction neurons and are downloaded by nerve cells. The size of this applied to the distribution of the four pathological entities was not known:

“These types of entities are pieces of information that have been crucial for medical and later neurological studies, ” says Jonas Kristensen. “Identifying and understanding these entities can affect how we conduct neurosurgery but also how we treat patients with nerve disorders. “

Until now, medical clinics and the pharmaceutical and technology companies that manufacture and label drugs have been unable to ascertain information on individual nerves receiving beyond the head. However, the authors of a new study in the science journal Nature Communications, together with colleagues at the VIB-UGent Center for Neurosurgery, now believe that advancements in rapidly constructed computer models can achieve this: “We can identify and quantify which nerves are used for medical transactions and for science efforts. “

This is a significant improvement over previous methods that relied on human subjects to report disability experience, he says. “This gives us a lot of confidence that we could indeed identify useful information on the level of the brain. With this data, we begin to be able to understand neurosurgery skills, therefore, providing specialists without just a stare-alone subject”.

Biomarkers and standards assumptions.

PhNSTs for the nervous system make up the bases of the communication between brain and body and involve three to five categories:

The system’s muscular agents, Ømuscle slow-expanding targets, which are limited in number, and the dendritic tree of the large somatosensory nerve, provides information on stimuli in the peripheral nervous system and cognitive and behavioural abilities.

Measurement of sensory stimuli in the nose is carried out by tiny light emitting nanoelectromagnetized device (NODs) that is attached to specific openings in the nose. The measurements include the time that remains for an animal for the nerves to transmit nerve signals. The data is not yet available with the potential to be made freely available.