Any Facebook user can download this program.

CSIC develops web program to test visual cleverness of Facebook users A team of experts from the Spanish National Analysis Council are suffering from a web application to test the visual cleverness of Facebook users through the social network. The new system will enable experts to test different cognitive skills also to obtain large amounts of data that determine what parameters have an effect on the brain’s visual capacity. Any Facebook user can download this program , which consists of different assessments for measuring visual cleverness and calculation ability ?bacterial infections . Gonzalo Garc-a de Polavieja, CSIC researcher and mind of the enquiry who functions for Cajal Institute claims: ‘It is the first time that we use a social networking for a cognitive study. This will enable us to obtain large amounts of details on the cognitive capability of Internet users worldwide. Once we gather that given information, we will analyze it in order to obtain innovative versions and results on visible ability’. Related StoriesLiposomal sizing and the Coulter principle: an interview with Professor Melvin E. KlegermanWhy do we sleep? An interview with Professor WisdenUnderstanding the sources of sudden loss of life in epilepsy: an interview with Professor Sanjay SisodiyaSurveying visual ability The application, programmed in PHP and Javascript, is presented as a simple game with a maximum duration of three minutes. Before participants start answering, they are asked for authorization to make use of their profile and basic personal information, such as age or host to birth. After obtaining their consent, the startup screen appears and game rules are offered. CSIC researcher and device programmer -ngel Carlos Rom-n specifies: ‘Then, two types of games start. Firstly, participants are asked to estimate, for example, how many pencils can be seen in a particular figure. Then, they are also asked to estimate which of two options has the largest quantity of pencils. Furthermore, some of these games can collect social information, such as the quantity of people that have chosen a particular answer’. After they have answered the questions, the scheduled program estimates the score based on their correct answers and responding time. The result appears in a list, with all users’ results, and below the application suggests that an individual invites his close friends to participate in the game as well. The generated data will be kept in a text document hosted in a exterior server of CSIC. Based on the researchers, ‘the outcomes will help us to know what factors affect the visual capability. This evaluation will enable us to illustrate a model of these kinds of answers in humans’.


CT colonography most suitable choice for regular screening for cancer Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths generally in most developed countries. Screening for colorectal malignancies and polyps has been shown to lower the number of deaths from cancer. Most malignancy societies and preventive task forces recommend regular screening for colon cancer. Physicians recommend colonoscopy for screening often. Unfortunately, this process is uncomfortable and sometimes outcomes in perforation of the colon, leading to death sometimes. Related StoriesOvarian cancer sufferers with a brief history of oral contraceptive make use of have better outcomesSausages With Antioxidants From Berries To Prevent CancerNew RNA check of blood platelets can be used to identify location of cancerCT colonography is a comparatively new imaging technology that can be used to examine the large bowel and rectum where these cancers happen. It is a noninvasive technique that reveals malignancy lesions and polyps with nearly the same sensitivity and specificity as colonoscopy, without the dangers of bowel perforation. This study by colleagues and Heitman compares the expenses and effectiveness of the two methods to screening, using assumed prevalences of polyps and cancers among average-risk people 50 to 74 years of age. They found that screening 100 000 sufferers with CT colonography would cost $2.3 million more than with colonoscopy, and would prevent 3.8 fatal perforations – – but simultaneously, this method would lead to 4.1 cancer-related deaths from polyps not noticed with CT, which would become malignant later. New technologies are attractive always. Because CT colonography will not physically invade your body, it has even more appeal – – it is easier for patients to accept. Its cost, however, is much higher, and its own benefit is only slightly lower than when colonoscopy is used.